Peru’s Political Earthquake: Crime Wave Triggers Presidential Downfall
In a dramatic turn of events, Peru has witnessed one of its most abrupt political shifts in recent memory. On October 10, 2025, the Peruvian Congress impeached and removed President Dina Boluarte from office, citing her inability to contain a spiraling wave of violent crime and her failure to maintain public confidence. Her removal comes amid mounting public outrage as Peru grapples with soaring homicide rates, extortion, gang violence, and a deepening sense of insecurity.
This removal marks yet another chapter in Peru’s ongoing political turbulence — and raises urgent questions about governance, public safety, and the rule of law in a country long beset by institutional fragility.
The Road to Impeachment: A Presidency Under Siege
From Vice President to President
Dina Boluarte, originally elected as vice president in 2021, assumed the presidency in December 2022 after her predecessor, Pedro Castillo, was impeached and arrested following an attempted dissolution of Congress.
From the outset, her mandate was challenged — she inherited a politically fragmented legislature, intense social polarization, and widespread protests in rural and indigenous regions.
Persistent Turbulence and Political Struggles
Throughout her presidency, Boluarte faced repeated attempts to remove her via motions of “moral incapacity,” a constitutional mechanism in Peru allowing Congress to depose a leader deemed unable to fulfill their duties.
Several of these motions failed, often due to political maneuvering, fragile coalitions, or reluctance from her former allies.
Her administration was also dogged by scandal. Among the most well known was “Rolexgate,” a controversy surrounding unreported luxury gifts including watches that critics claimed undermined her credibility. At times she awarded herself a salary increase, which provoked further backlash amid deep economic inequality. Meanwhile, the president’s approval ratings sank to historic lows — widely reported in the 2–4 percent range in the months prior to her removal.
The Crime Surge That Broke the Camel’s Back
While political instability made the presidency precarious, it was the security crisis that ultimately sealed Boluarte’s fate.
-
Rising homicide tolls: Between January and August 2025, just under 6,041 people were killed — the highest death toll for that period in several years.
-
Explosive growth of extortion: Reports of extortion surged, with nearly 16,000 complaints filed between January and July — a 28 percent increase over the same period in 2024.
-
Violent incidents in public spaces: The final straw came after a mass shooting at a concert in Lima, in which five people were wounded. That attack galvanized public outrage and galvanized lawmakers to act.
Boluarte’s critics pointed to her administration’s inability to rein in powerful criminal organizations operating along Peru’s porous borders, insufficient policing in urban centers, and lax border controls supporting illicit flows of weapons and contraband. She also drew condemnation for remarks that blamed illegal immigration for strengthening criminal networks — remarks many saw as scapegoating instead of solutions.
The Impeachment Vote and the Transfer of Power
A Vote Without Opposition
In a dramatic overnight session, Congress convened to debate four separate motions for impeachment. Each motion cited “permanent moral incapacity” in line with Article 113 of the Peruvian Constitution. When Boluarte failed to appear in her defense, lawmakers moved swiftly. In total, 124 votes were cast in favor of her removal — with no votes against and no abstentions — a rare moment of unity in Peru’s fragmented political landscape. Some reports mention 118 or 124 votes; the exact tally varies across sources.
José Jerí: Interim President
Immediately after the vote, José Jerí — the 38-year-old president of Congress — was sworn in as interim president to complete Boluarte’s term until elections in April 2026. Jerí vowed to defend Peru’s sovereignty, restore security, and prepare for a clean handover to a democratically elected successor. His appointment makes him one in a long line of short-term leaders in a country accustomed to volatility.
Boluarte responded in a final televised address, insisting she had acted in Peru’s best interests, though her speech was abruptly cut short as the broadcast shifted to Jerí’s inauguration.
Underlying Drivers: Why Crime Became the Catalyst
Weak Institutions, Weak Enforcement
For decades, Peru’s criminal justice system has struggled with underfunded law enforcement, corruption within police ranks, judicial delays, and impunity for high-level criminals. Even when organized crime groups are identified, prosecutions often fail, reinforcing the perception that the state is ill-equipped to deliver justice.
In many regions — especially in remote Andean and jungle provinces — local governments have little presence, allowing cartels, gangs, and drug traffickers to dominate. This decentralization of state control makes national security coordination especially challenging.
Geography and Borders
Peru’s geography works against it. It shares long stretches of isolated border with Colombia, Brazil, and Bolivia — all with porous checkpoints and known smuggling routes. These logistical realities facilitate the flow of illicit goods, weapons, and traffickers, complicating coordinated security efforts.
Socioeconomic Inequality and Social Fragmentation
Deep divides between urban elites and marginalized rural or indigenous communities contribute to political disaffection and weak state presence in some areas. Economic underdevelopment, lack of opportunities, and entrenched poverty make some populations vulnerable to criminal recruitment.
The protests and tensions in Peru’s southern highlands during prior years reflected underlying social unrest — many citizens felt excluded from political power and skeptical of centralized authority.
Political Instability & Distrust
Frequent turnover of leaders, overlapping powers with a fractious Congress, and repeated impeachment threats have weakened continuity in security strategy. Each new administration faces steep learning curves and often shifts priorities midstream — hampering long-term, coherent policies against crime.
When citizens see crisis after crisis — presidents deposed, policies reversed, leadership vacuums — trust in institutions erodes. That distrust can depress cooperation with police, reduce community policing efficacy, and leave neighborhoods calculably vulnerable.
Will the Interim Government Succeed?
Immediate Priorities
Jerí’s interim government faces enormous pressure and sharp expectations:
-
Rebuild public confidence by delivering visible security improvements in Lima and major cities.
-
Police reform to root out corruption, improve resource allocation, and empower more responsive local units.
-
Judicial reinforcement to accelerate prosecutions for extortion, organized crime, and gang violence.
-
Coordination with neighboring countries to monitor cross‐border criminal networks.
-
Transparent governance to signal a break from political cronyism that plagued prior administrations.
While Jerí’s time is limited, his ability to effect lasting change depends on setting credible priorities and mobilizing national consensus.
Pitfalls and Constraints
-
Limited mandate: As an interim president, his legitimacy is narrower, and he may lack political capital or cooperation from entrenched interests.
-
Congressional fragmentation: Even Congress backed Boluarte’s removal unanimously — but that unity may fray once the transitional government seeks real policy implementation.
-
Short timeframe: Elections in April 2026 leave only months to stabilize security before campaigning begins.
-
Deep structural issues: No government can fix decades of systemic weakness in months. Long-term reform will require sustained commitment across administrations.
What This Means for Peru and the Region
A Turning Point — or Just Another Episode?
Boluarte’s removal underscores how deeply the crime crisis has shaken Peru’s political equilibrium. Political instability and public disenchantment have often been cyclical, but this instance ties downfall explicitly to security failures — not just ideological conflict or corruption scandals.
If Jerí succeeds — even modestly — in calming violence and restoring confidence, it could mark a shift: security as the litmus test for political legitimacy. But if violence persists or escalates, the interim government may quickly lose support, inflaming divisions again.
Regional Ramifications
Latin America has seen a resurgence of violent crime in multiple states, often as a byproduct of transnational trafficking, weak institutions, and post-Covid economic disruption. Peru’s turn toward crisis reflects wider regional challenges of state capacity, overlapping criminal networks, and the limits of traditional models of policing.
Neighboring nations and blocs may increasingly view Peru as a bellwether — if it cannot stabilize its streets despite huge public pressure, it signals deeper malaise in the region’s ability to govern frontiers and ensure citizen security.
International Attention and Support
Peru’s crisis is already drawing international concern. The new government may seek technical assistance from multilateral organizations, security partnerships with neighboring states, or foreign investment in reconstruction of law enforcement infrastructure.
But foreign assistance is no substitute for homegrown reform. Unless Peru addresses root causes — institutional weakness, socioeconomic exclusion, corruption — external support will only be a stopgap.
A Fragile Transition in an Age of Insecurity
The ouster of President Dina Boluarte reflects a dramatic moment in Peru’s long struggle with crime, inequality, and institutional fragility. Her removal was not simply a political shift but a stark public verdict: that failure to protect life and safety is unacceptable in a democracy.
Yet the road ahead is fraught. The new interim presidency of José Jerí inherits a broken legacy, urgent crimes to curb, and a skeptical public demanding rescue. If he fails, Peru may plunge into renewed unrest just as the 2026 elections approach.
The test before Peru isn’t just whether crime can be reduced in the short term — but whether the state can regain legitimacy, institutions can be strengthened, and citizens can once again believe in their government’s capacity to protect them.